The Manipulation of Human Society:How Deep Is the Rabbit Hole? Part 3, Disease

Once people have become sufficiently 'invested' in the illusion of freedom (as with the great sacrifices demanded by war), should facts to the contrary be presented, denial and cognitive dissonance can set in rapidly for defense of the status quo and treasured beliefs—especially the mindset relating to patriotism. Unquestioning, or blind, patriots are the prized sheep of the Elite.

Fear is also a key Elite control mechanism. Most cases of Elite manipulation of human society utilize the effective tactic of fearmongering, usually by creating some form of 'chaos' (diasease, for example).

With the exposé of the recent Wall Street/banking fraud, it shouldn't be difficult to convince anyone that rigged economics, including banking, currency, and market systems, are very effective methods of dominance and control. In the US, especially, this method has progressed from the covert category to more overt, as operatives become ever more brassy in the face of a distracted, bewildered, and captive citizenry.

In many minds, the solution to financial chaos is to get back to the time when, it is imagined, things were running properly. But this brings up the central theme of this series. How deep is the rabbit hole? Are people clamoring to get back to the 'good' time, which was really just a time of more covert thievery and economic slavery than now? In other words, slavery (like 'good jobs') sold as desirable by the control merchants, or keepers of the matrix.

Law also becomes a control mechanism and, in many cases, an outright affront to liberty, as with marijuana and other politically motivated 'illicit-drug' laws. Destruction of liberty is certainly exemplified via the responses by authority to chaotic conditions created by the Elite in the first place, such as 9/11 and 'organized' terrorism.

The Illuminati thrive on chaos—war, crime, violence, terrorism, and so on. Beyond just the twisted pleasure the Elite derive from this, serious threats to society (often enough just propaganda) result in a more acquiescent populace, willing to accept loss of liberty, and demanding more intrusion by aspects of security the Elite heavily influence or control—law enforcement, 'intelligence' agencies, police, and armed forces. A central Elite tactic is known as 'Problem-Reaction-Solution,' wherein concocted chaos especially, but also spontaneous chaos, elicits a mass reaction (usually fear), leading to a 'solution' that advances the Elite Agenda.

Concocted chaos, such as 9/11, facilitates the creation/expansion of infrastructure needed for the switch to overt control should the threshold of awareness be widely breached. Of course, the controllers don't have to wait that long, and can create sufficient chaos to 'justify' going overt. For example, US Congressmen were threatened with martial law if bailout thievery was not approved.

It is suggested that government per se is an Elite, anti-tribal construct for mass control, as are the major religions. In addition to programmed, formalized behavior control, both control categories provide rich opportunity for society's scripters to set groups against one another (usually by placing operatives on both/all sides). By the discouragement in many ways of widespread realization of the all-encompassing Unity that we are, the key Illuminati tactic of 'divide and conquer' thrives, with induced or inflamed conflict between/among targeted groups.

Not that humans aren't already predisposed to conflict (here the question of possible ancient DNA manipulation enters), but the Illuminati are experts at using human nature against us—even our 'good' qualities. Love, and loyalty to homeland, for example, are used to manipulate. Elite constructs provide mechanisms for insider gains in wealth, power, and political influence. No better example than the two World Wars and the Cold War, which were Elite operations.

The political election process is theoretically critical to any free society managed by a government. For society's masters, one trouble is that an informed electorate might make it difficult, perhaps impossible, for them to operate. It makes sense, therefore, to prevent the electorate from being informed. Thus, on one level, propaganda becomes an even more important tool in a 'free' society than it is in a fascist one. As a result, today's mainstream curricula present sanitized, redacted, superficial history.

When you survey the world today, you know: When a child dies in this world of preventable disease every two seconds; when the economic system of the world must destroy the earth simply for that system to survive; when you see all the wars, and when you see all the pain, and when you see all the suffering, is it a force of love and wisdom and tolerance that is in control of this planet? ...

We have ... a fake self-identity in believing we are the body. There is a calculated cabal that is systematically seeking to hold us in that illusory self-identity.
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/43355-david-icke-still-crazy-after-all-these-years

The aspects of chaos cited above by David Icke are, among other things, means of locking our minds into that exploitable self-identity. The affliction of illness upon people is part of the same systematic conspiracy. This is covered up, again in Orwellian fashion, by the propaganda tool, which paints the conventional medical lily much whiter than it is.

Disease

There is no more ruthless propaganda in society than medical dogma. This is especially so because it takes on the aura of science. The creation/perpetuation of illness is a particularly nasty, covert (but becoming much more blatant) method of control. And true to the Elite's Orwellian style, a central mechanism for this is the system set up by the Rockefeller family ostensibly to cure illness—the conventional medical establishment, which is run and ruthlessly controlled 'on the ground' by the pharmaceutical corporatocracy (Pharma).

For conventional medicine, I use the more concise term 'conmedicine' to refer to this band of murderous thieves. I'm speaking primarily of the corporate sector—there are many well-intentioned people practicing in the rank and file. But someone in the conventional academic venue (I've lost the attribution) wrote this of the indoctrination: "A medical education is the warping of unuspecting, immature minds into a meticulous system of commercial superstition."

Meaning, essentially, brainwash, and under the control of Big Pharma.

The critical distinction must be noted between trauma/crisis intervention on one hand, at which conventional medicine excels, and engendering wellness on the other, at which it fails miserably—to the point of literally killing around 780,000 Americans per year.
http://www.healthe-livingnews.com/articles/death_by_medicine_part_1.html
Moreover, admiration for the skill in trauma/crisis intervention must be tempered by the fact that conmedical dogma and practice produce many of the crises in the first place.

Of course, these days, the medical travesty is no secret to all but desperate deniers, who might include self-serving politicians (system feeders). Stubborn believers continue to walk, run, ride, hop, skip, and jump to raise money for disease research (theft of wealth). This behavior has been made so politically correct, that even people who have doubts or even know better still indulge in it. For some, this might be a way of avoiding unpleasant truth and affirming their faith in the system, or humanity: so noble a pursuit as medical research could not possibly be mostly a scam.

One irony is that there's a lot of honest, helpful quality research that doesn't attain official acceptance and introduction into mainstream practice.

A considerable number of books and articles have been written on the devastating effect of conmedicine on health and society, citing the profit motive as cause. Profit is almost always more a means than an end for the multibillionaires and trillionaires orchestrating most of the major life-and-death issues humanity faces.

Few if any writers emphasize the key point: a sick population is much easier to control. Being stuck on the 'medical merry-go-round' of repetitious or chronic illness is enervating to say the least, and is an important component of the array of distractions from socio-political reality thrust at people in the Idiotized Society (see Part 1 of this series). This serves also to assist in locking people into sense-bound reality, wherein the Elite have the advantage.

One could cite numerous clearcut actions by authority to quash/ignore any wellness modality (such as the attack on homeopathy near the turn of the 20th Century in America) that threatens the financial bonanza and/or mitigates the iatrogenic (disease-causing) effect of conmedical examination and treatment.

The names Royal Rife, Wilhelm Reich, Harry Hoxsey, and Stanislaw Burzynski come easily to mind as victims of the Rockefeller-engendered medico-legal monopoly, which became solidified by the formation of the American Medical Association, and is thus virtually synonymous with it. Along the way, of course, and again in Orwellian fashion, conmedicine has insinuated itself into, if not created, the alphabet soup of government 'health' agencies, such as USDA, FDA, HHS, CDC, NIH, CFDC, ad nauseam, to subvert the purported public-service functions.

Industrial parents, forced to procreate manpower for a world into which nobody fits who has not been crushed and molded by sixteen years of formal education, feel impotent to care personally for their offspring and, in despair, shower them with medicine. - Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health

Major Turning Point in History
If one had to pick a turning point that facilitated the forging of conmedicine into the nemesis it is today, it would be the unqualified acceptance of Louis Pasteur's germ theory of disease in the late nineteenth century by the French Academy of Science. Chemist Louie was connected to people in high political places (meaning almost certainly Illuminati infestation or influence), and his superficial theory carried more weight in the Academy than the insightful theories of life scientists like Claude Bernard and, especially, Antoine Béchamp, whose work Pasteur plagiarized. - Bechamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology, Ethel Douglas Hume, first published: 1923, C.W. Daniel Company Ltd, UK; Fourth Edition, 1963, published in U.S. by Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research. Since published by various companies, including Health Research Books
http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/
The fundamental difference for 'political science' was that Pasteurian dogma promised high profit potential and iatrogenesis (vaccination a huge component of this), while the Béchamp/Bernard vitalist theory was essentially holistic, leading to wellness.

Pasteurian dogma says microorganisms cause diseases. This seems true on the surface, but it is only half true. One key is the definition of 'disease.' Germ theory furthered the notion that a disease is the collection of symptoms, or is even the 'bug' that causes the body to produce them.

Béchamp, on the other hand, would say that the actual disease invisibly underlies the collection of symptoms and even 'causes' the germs (their proliferation, that is, since they are all around and even in us) to which 'the disease' is attributed. He said of the germ theory that it is all the more dangerous because it can be proven scientifically. A man of wry humor, who felt the sting of 'political science,' as history passed him by. If Béchamp were alive today, he would cringe in horror at what passes for scientific medicine, especially the debacle that passes for vaccine 'science.'

Another prominent scientist of the time said:
If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue—rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue. - Rudoph Virchow, founder of modern pathology

Key to Perpetuating/Creating Illness
The major turning point in medical history allows one to see how the flawed conmedical paradigm works today to perpetuate illness. Pasteur's germ theory asserted that each 'bug' causes *a* disease. This reinforced, and is part and parcel of, the notion known as the 'specific-disease doctrine.' This questionable concept is deeply entrained into society—even to the point of people saying, "Well, you have to die of something," meaning *a* disease, as opposed to the cycle of one's life coming peacefully to an end. The motto of my former health practice was, "It's natural to die healthy!"

And true to the Illuminati's promotion of conflict, conmedicine is all about 'fighting' specific diseases—war on this, war on that. It's all phony BS for mind conditioning.

The famous nurse Florence Nightingale said, "The specific- disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds such as now rule in the medical profession." It seems the only mistake she made was assuming weakness instead of soulless malfeasance, although some of the "rulers" could have been weak-minded followers of orders. Certainly, "unstable" fit.

Florence said further: "There are no specific diseases: there are specific disease conditions." Meaning, that underlying the purported disease is the real disease: a set of common physical/energetic conditions (aka imbalances) routinely ignored and even worsened by conmedicine. These conditions appear as symptoms, which are the body's response to the conditions. The collection of symptoms, then, is erroneously called *a* disease (a symptomatology, actually). Béchamp referred to the underlying condition as a "dirty or clean condition" of what he called the "inner terrain." Thus, Béchamp was probably the first Western scientist to see disease as a matter of inner-ecology.

The set of common underlying conditions, or imbalances, includes such things as toxicity; pH imbalance (acid-base/energetic); nutritional insufficiency; chronic, subclinical dehydration; and dysbiosis. The latter is the disruption of the extraordinarily complex population of microorganisms (I call them microbeings to indicate their intelligence), inside and out, especially in the gut, that participate in maintaining health—in part by maintaining an environment discouraging to disease organisms. Anyone who examines conmedical theory and practice will see that it has traditionally avoided addressing these conditions whenever possible.

Although things are improving a bit, the absolutely critical issue of dysbiosis has been routinely ignored by conmedical 'science' from Pasteur to present, while conventional treatment has done all in its power to cause/worsen this imbalance. Antibiotics were a particularly devastating primary means, but many drugs come into play.

One's psyche can also play a major role in physical illness and even in the weakening of gut microbeings, but it is much more difficult to produce illness in a physically balanced inner terrain than otherwise, and severity will be lessened.

The specific disease doctrine is the central scam, or biggest 'secret,' of medical dogma. The extent and effectiveness of the brainwash is clear. Conventional 'cures' potentiate the perpetuation of illness.

Either or both of two things happen following 'successful' conventional treatment: 1) The symptomatology that was forced to disappear (usually chemically), returns, possibly with a vengeance; or/and 2) a new symptomology arises at a later point, wherein conmedicine says, in effect: "Well, we cured you of that last disease; this is a new one," (implying its own blamelessness).

Chasing symptoms is tantamount to painting over rust, although it sometimes produces spectacular effects appearing to the unwary as a cure. But failing to address, and thereby potentially worsening, the underlying conditions does not foster wellness. This is the case with conventional cancer treatment, for example. It is testimony to the human spirit: It is suggested that most people get better in spite of 'poison-slash-and-burn' conventional cancer treatment, not because of it.

At the corporate level, it's quite difficult to imagine or identify a motive for curing anything. There is simply far more money in research and ineffective/iatrogenic treatment than in any genuine cure which might be found. Most of the touted 'successes' of conmedicine, when examined closely, will be seen to be PR coups. An excellent example is the claimed eradication of polio in mid 20th century America. This scam is clearly exposed by Walene James in her excellent book, Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, and by Janine Roberts in her more technical but very readable blockbuster Fear of the Invisible. Of course, the polio scam is corollary to the greater scam of vaccination in general, a major pretender to the prevention of 'diseases,' and an outcropping of Pasteur's phony/inadequate science.
http://www.geminipress.com/symptoms4.html
Here is a great, short piece by Russel Blaylock, MD on known, dangerous vaccinal effects being ignored:
http://www.whale.to/a/blaylock34.html

For anyone who disbelieves that a massive, even global, scam could never be run on society without being exposed, Roberts's book cited above proves beyond question that the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is a massive scientific fraud. Which leads to the question of research intergrity.

Research Also Flawed
Conventional research, most of which is also widely controlled by Pharma, is based philosophically upon the central scam, and is thus also flawed, ultimately perpetuating the illness merry-go-round. This is why it is much better on the whole to avoid giving any money to funding drives for conventional disease resarch.

Let's take a solid case in point. Despite numerous cases of culpability, Pharma continues to release highly dangerous drugs in the US with FDA approval. This includes such insults as the "SSRI" class of antidepressants. Here is a quote from neurosurgeon Russel Blaylock that demands careful consideration under the light of conspiracy to injure, kill, and generate fear and chaos (but the system is set up to make such evil profitable, as fines are rarely sufficient). Blaylock wrote this four days after the horrific shooting at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA, on Monday April 16, 2007:

Of special concern is whether he was on SSRI (selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor) psychotropic medications, such as the fluorinated antidepressants (Paxil, Prozac). You may recall that these same antidepressants appeared in most of the other cases of school shootings. There is growing evidence that the SSRI medications, as well as other fluorinated medications, are resulting in increased acts of violence, either suicide, homicide or both.

The first link to SSRI medications came in 1989 when Joseph Weisbecker shot and killed eight people and wounded 12 others before killing himself. The ensuing lawsuit charged that Weisbecker had just started on an SSRI anti-depressant and that the maker, Eli Lilly, knew that violent behavior was a complication of their medication. Today, both the FDA and the Canadian regulatory agencies recognize that the SSRI medications can induce some people to harm themselves or others. GlaxoSmithKline, maker of Paxil (paraoxetine), admits "hostile episodes" as a complication.
In fact, in their own clinical trials they found homicides, homicidal acts, homicidal ideation and aggressive behavior to be a side effect of the medication. In addition, it was found that children with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) taking the medication experienced hostility episodes 17-times more often than depressed patients. Of particular concern was the finding that 1.1% of healthy, psychiatrically normal people who took an SSRI anti-depressant experienced one or more hostile episodes, while none taking the placebo had such an event. - Russel Blaylock, MD
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/4/19/194210.shtml?s=lh

If you or I premeditatedly kill someone and are caught, we're 'out of business.' If Pharma does so, it's a just a slap on the wrist in the form of a fine. Profits almost always make the fines a good investment. The conscious propagation of illness falls within the maniacal genocidality of the Elite, who seem to thrive on the very vibrational energy of fear, suffering, and death.

Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it. - John Lennon

Illuminati tactics often serve multiple purposes. A great example is that airport surveillance is now irradiating people with full-body scanners to thwart terrorism, which is an Illuminati protection racket in the first place. Scanning is sure to cause a wave of cancer, especially among frequent flyers.

A seemingly unlikely mechanism for the propagation of illness is conventional dentistry. Cancer, heart problems, MS, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, dementia, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression have been linked to dental issues. These ills have been associated mostly with three dental procedures: mercury amalgam fillings, other electrically conductive and/or heavy metals in the mouth, and root canals. See Root Canal Coverup, by George E. Meinig, DDS (and Tooth Truth, by Frank J. Jerome, DDS).

Pathogenic Adjuncts to Conmedicine
Traditionally, three critical adjuncts have played into the game of generating illness: 1) Pesticide-based industrial agriculture, whose noxious substances were originally poison chemicals from World War I, with new labels; 2) industrial pollution; and 3) chemicalized, heavily processed 'food.' More recently, the criminally negligent deployment of wireless technology, whose deleterious health effects have been known since the 1970's, throws volatile fuel on the fire. Such coordination of the assault on health strongly suggests Elite orchestration, and fits their agenda of slow genocide.

Here is a good example of purposeful industrial pollution:
Given the fantastic scale of fluorescent mercury bulbs needing to be disposed of, we are going to see – are seeing – serious mercury contamination in garbage and landfill sites. Yes, they shouldn’t be disposed of like this, but that is what vast numbers of people will do rather than take them to hazardous waste centres. The Control System knows that.

Already an estimated 80 million used fluorescent tubes are sent to landfill sites in the UK every year, according to the waste education organisation, WasteAware. This equates to four tonnes of lethal mercury and the figure for throughout Europe and North America must be mind-blowing.

This puts collectors of refuse at risk from any broken bulbs disposed of in household waste, and also other neighbours in communal situations, and those dumped in landfills on the scale that is coming have the clear potential to pollute ground water supplies, rivers and fish with cumulative and deadly mercury contamination. Once again, this is by design. The plan is to mass poison humans from endless sources as part of the global cull of the population and also to suppress us mentally through chemical influence.

But there is another vital aspect to the imposition of fluorescent lighting – its vibrational effect. The base state of everything in this reality is vibration or waveform. The chemical, electrical, digital and holographic levels are but expressions of the waveform information construct.

So disrupt that and you disrupt everything else down the line. This is what these bulbs are designed to do – create a distorted vibrational environment in every home and workplace where these lights shine, and that's a key reason why so many people experience health problems after buying them to 'reduce my carbon footprint'. - David Icke, Jan 28, 2011 Newsletter, 'Global Warming' ... Is Killing Us (And It's Designed To)

New Waves of Illness
1) Wireless Technology
The the latest and greatest, albeit non-conmedical, wave of illness creation is wireless technology, something that promises to be worse by orders of magnitude than anything conjured yet
(with the possible exception of Depleted Uranium Munitions [DU]:
http://www.currentconcerns.ch/index.php?id=614
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=SHR20060302&articleId=2057
Excellent documentary on DU and other US military/government abuse of soldiers:
http://www.beyondtreason.com/ )

Well aware of the dangers of microwave radiation from at least the 1970's, perhaps even the '50's, the industry deployed this addictive techno-fascination anyway, while denying the truth as it expanded post-deployment. This is the same, but 'on steroids,' as Pharma's realease, and FDA approval, of drugs that injure and kill.

The multi-edged sword of wireless tech not only causes illness, but encourages frivolous entertainment. Both serve as distractions, or wastes of time, energy, and resources that could otherwise be expended in understanding and countering the control system. 'Dependence' upon wireless exists now to the extent that even people who know better still embrace the monster. One of the best early articles written on microwave dangers is here
http://www.whale.to/b/firstenberg1.html

A more recent report covers 1970's to 2008. Professor Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute and professor at The Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden has researched for 30 years in electromagnetic radiation (EMR/EMF/ELF). Like many honest researchers, such as the ones cited above, and now vaccine researcher Andrew Wakefield, Professor Johansson is experiencing harassment and scientific injustice for threatening the Agenda of the illness creators.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNYNJIvylQo

However, you won't even find very many critics of microwave technology emphasizing the critical truth: the only known safe dose of microwave radiation is zero.
http://eliehouse.wordpress.com/2010/11/13/gamma-waves-and-rfmicrowave-radiation-are-carcinogenic-and-genotoxic-safe-dose-is-zero/

It's not the same with microwave as with chemical toxins, because, within limits, lower doses can be even more harmful than higher ones. Thus, the towers and antennas are the biggest threat, because they are in constant operation, bathing the sheeple in a sea of health/life-draining electromagnetic energy.
http://mast-victims.org/index.php?content=welcome

Moreover, wirless tech brings up a serious Constitutional issue in the US, since 'your' behavior is not supposed to threaten 'my' health and life. Hence, the more recent tobacco/smoking laws. But microwave is exponentially worse than cigarettes by virtue of its omnipresence.

Well-intentioned, but seemingly uninformed (perhaps phony?) attempts have been made to put limits on the power output of towers. Where a limit above zero is allowed, one can only hope that the specification is low enough to prevent acceptable operation of phones. Use will therefore cease, and hopefully the tower would be shut off. Here's an example: The following video reports that the principality of Liechstenstein has set a very low limit:
http://videos.next-up.org/SfTv/Liechtenstein/AdoptsTheStandardOf06VmBioInitiative/09112008.html
The Liechtenstein video also contains a section called The Microwave Syndrome, which includes two eye-opening charts showing human microwave effects.

Early research focused on human concerns while ignoring the environment, as one might expect from the Nature-alienated Idiotized Society. This is changing now, and the following site does express concern for non-human life, recommending increased research in all areas.
http://www.emrnetwork.org/index.htm

Although it sounds responsible to champion research, it has been known to become a delay mechanism. In this case, the danger is beyond question and was known decades ago. While research proceeds, all living things are assaulted. Wireless tech fits the Illuminati illness/slow genocide agenda perfectly.

Whereas, in a sane society, there would be mass consumer rejection of wireless technology and a loud and persistent demand that the entire system be shut down until safety for all species has been proven—which should have been done in the first place. The wholesale corruption of that process screams Illuminati loud and clear. "What?!" you will hear the faithful scream; "This would threaten convenience and probably cause companies to fail, jobs to be lost, maybe even a severe recession!" Once more the Idiotized Society rears its ugly head: We must commit suicide—destroy the earth, poison the kids, and get sick and die—to have prosperity. Is this not sufficiently widespread insanity that has become the jealously defended norm?

Trying to establish safe power levels is simply ignorant or evil. Stunning is the fact that people are now so addicted to this suicidal technology that, even though many know the dangers, especially for children, they continue use. These days, the wireless "Kindle" is a huge seller on Amazon. A perfect example of "economy über alles," and how kids are the collateral damage of the system and its toxic, pathogenic, suicidal 'Consumer Orgy.'

There were a million people on the streets of London protesting at the plan to invade Iraq. [The Elite] invaded Iraq and killed so far in excess of a million people. There are endless protests all over the world against globalization and its injustices: Globalization gets faster. There are endless protests against world poverty, and world poverty just expands. You know, instead of protesting, and then going home or going down the bar and feeling good about ourselves because we've protested, we need to come together and stop cooperating with the system that is enslaving us and depends on our cooperation to survive. - David Icke (from a video—exact citation lost).

2) Agricultural Biotechnology
Not to be outdone by conmedicine in creating illness, industrial agriculture has cultivated a major new boil on its oozing hide. The poison-spewing cabal, comprised of major corporate criminals led by Monsanto, continues to dig its cloven hooves in, especially in the United Snakes of Amerika, to ensure that its campaign of premeditated pathogenicity (and environmental destruction) results in the contamination of all US farmland and the environment. This is to be accomplished with Genetically Modified Organisms (called 'food', or GMOs,) and the poison used to grow them, mostly one called "Roundup," by Monsanto, consisting of the very nasty poison, glyphosate
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/DMPGR.php

Here's an interesting fact: Just about every species of animal offered a GMO versus the corresponding real food to eat will avoid the GMO. Often they will do this to the point of starvation, as they have an intuitive sense of the danger. Politicians and humans? No sense.

Shocking, yet typical, is that the US government keeps parroting the scientifically nonsensical utterances of the well-remunerated spin doctors of biotech companies, i.e. that GMOs are "substantially equivalent" to their traditional counterparts and therefore safe. GM food products contain antibiotic resistant marker genes, viral promoters (see below), and foreign proteins never before consumed by humans and not found in crops produced through normal hybridization (bad enough itself).

The concept of 'substantial equivalence' (SE) in no way arises from evidence-based science. In fact, like vaccine 'science,' it deserves a new term: "Nonscience" (pronounced like "conscience"). SE was coined by underhanded biotech lawyers and written into law by GHW Bush, who issued an Executive Order proclaiming GM plants to be "substantially equivalent" and therefore not needing any health study or testing. And this is the crux of the matter – no specific human safety study has been conducted, except for one small 'study'– referred to as the Newcastle Feeding Study – conducted in 2003, which proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that even after one small meal containing GM soya, transgenes could transfer out of GM food into the host's gut bacteria at detectable levels.

These excerpts from an important scientific study on transgenics and viral promoters, republished in lay terms, should give pause (quotes not in exact original order):

To begin with, a 'promoter' is a stretch of genetic material that acts as a switch for turning genes on. ...

The story of the Cauliflower Mosaic Viral Promoter encapsulates and draws attention to the hazardous nature of the genetic engineering process itself as well as the foreign gene constructs created and released into the environment. ...

Prof. Joe Cummins of the University of Western Ontario was the first scientist to question the safety of the cauliflower mosaic viral (CaMV) promoter, which is in practically all GM crops currently grown commercially or undergoing field trials. His initial concern was that the promoter could recombine with other viruses to generate new disease-causing viruses. In our paper, we review some recent findings which give further grounds for concern, and have recommended the immediate withdrawal of all crops and products containing the CaMV promoter. ...

Each species protects its integrity and remains genetically stable because there are biological barriers that prevent distant species from interbreeding or otherwise exchanging genetic material. Foreign DNA are generally broken down or inactivated. Genetic engineering attempts to break down these biological barriers so genes can be arbitrarily transferred between species that would never interbreed in nature. ...

The findings that transgenic DNA has the tendency to break and join in several places imply that parts or all of it may be more likely than the plant's own DNA to jump out of the genome and successfully transfer horizontally to unrelated species. Horizontal gene transfer, in this context, means the transfer of the genetic material directly by infection to the genetic material of unrelated species, in principle to all species interacting with the GMO: bacteria, fungi, earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, insects, small mammals and human beings. This process is uncontrollable and cannot be recalled. The damages done are hence irreversible.

Transgenic DNA has been designed to be invasive and to overcome species barriers; once released, it will invade different organisms, especially bacteria which are in all environments, where it will multiply, mutate and recombine. There are additional findings which suggest an increased potential for the horizontal spread of transgenic DNA. For example, enzymes that insert the transgenic DNA into the genome can also help them to jump out again; DNA released from both dead or live cells can survive without being degraded in all environments, including the mouth and gut of mammals; DNA can be readily taken up into cells; and all cells can take up naked or free DNA. The instability of transgenic DNA may also be enhanced as the result of the metabolic stress inflicted on the organism by the CaMVpromoter that gives continuous over-expression of transgenes.

The major consequences of the horizontal transfer of transgenic DNA are the spread of antibiotic resistance marker genes among bacteria and the generation of new bacteria and new viruses that cause diseases from the many bacterial and viral genes used. ...

There is sufficient scientific evidence to support well-founded suspicion of serious, irreversible harm to justify the immediate withdrawal of all GM crops and products containing the CaMV promoter from environmental release.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/ge/mwhoviral.cfm
Link to corresponding technical article:
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/camvrecdis.php

And the foregoing was posted 12 years ago. Thus, the wanton potentiation of intractable illness goes on. Just as with wireless tech, despite credible science demonstrating a huge risk, we have corporate power, rat-ridden government, and lapdog-media PR effecting the deployment of life-threatening technology. Such orchestration, or coordination of these societal elements, indicates yet another Illuminati-sourced crisis. What could be more satanic?

The most recent assault on health and environment from AgBiotech is USDA deregulation of the satanic Monsanto Corporation's genetically engineered alfalfa:
http://www.naturalnews.com/031139_GE_alfalfa_deregulation.html
Prior to this egregious insult, three major retailers of organic foods genuflected before the satanic altar with a cleverly worded statement purporting to take a stance for organics, but asserting that organics "must coexist" with the biotech industry's Frankencrops.

A self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley, and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it's time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops, such as Monsanto's controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for "coexistence" with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.

... "The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must." - Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011

The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) says it rather well in one sentence:
There can be no such thing as "coexistence" with a reckless industry that undermines public health, destroys biodiversity, damages the environment, tortures and poisons animals, destabilizes the climate, and economically devastates the world's 1.5 billion seed-saving small farmers.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22449.cfm

Below is a list from the OCA showing the governmental/corporate level of manipulation over a stretch of time, as Elite operatives or dupes serve the overall Agenda:

How did we get to hormone residues and Frankenstuff (GMOs) for lunch? (Short answer: "Apathy and indifference are nurtured in the modern age as most peoples’ free time is frittered away with worthless trivia like ball games, computer games, movies and soaps, and fiddling with their mobile phones. These distractions might be fun, but after most of them you’ve learnt nothing of any value, and remain ignorant, malleable and suggestible, which is just how the elites want you." - Clive Maund)

(Longer, partial answer, or model: A BRIEF HISTORY OF MONSANTO AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, slightly edited)
http://www.organicconsumers.org/bytes/ob121.cfm
(Please note: The Mussolini quote on the OCA page is an Internet myth—statement never verified in his writings by scholars.)

1991: Margaret Miller was appointed Deputy Director of FDA by George Bush Sr. She oversaw the approval of the genetically engineered growth hormone rBGH. Prior to the appointment, she was one of Monsanto's top scientists developing rBGH. At the FDA, she approved the same rBGH studies she previously led at Monsanto, a notorious chemical polluter and ag biotech promoter.

1991: A right-wing extremist, Clarence Thomas, was appointed to the Supreme Court, despite nationwide opposition. Prior to his appointment, Thomas was a lawyer for Monsanto. He would later cast the decisive vote in 2000 on the Supreme Court, ratifying the stolen election that put George Bush Jr. into office.

1992: Michael Taylor was appointed FDA's Deputy Commissioner for Policy, a role created to expedite the approval process of genetically engineered foods. Prior to his appointment, Taylor was an attorney for Monsanto. Taylor went on to become Monsanto's Vice-President.

1993: Rufus Yerxa was nominated as U.S. deputy to the World Trade Organization. Prior to his apointment as one of the most powerful bureaucrats in the world regarding international trade policies, Rufus was Monsanto's Chief Counsel.

1996: Michael Kantor was appointed U.S. Secretary of Commerce. At that time, Kantor was also on the Board of Directors of Monsanto.

2000: The White House appoints Carol Tucker Foreman as the sole "consumer advocate" on an international committee assessing genetically modified NONfoods. Prior to her appointment, Foreman was a lobbyist for Monsanto.

2001: Anne Veneman was appointed head of the USDA, in charge of regulating, among other things, genetically engineered crops. Veneman previously served on the Board of Directors of Calgene, a Monsanto biotech subsidiary.

2001: Donald Rumsfeld was sworn in as Secretary or Defense. Rumsfeld was previously the CEO of the Searle pharmaceutical corporation (where he used political power to gain FDA approval of the poison aspartame contrary to the science), acquired by Monsanto.

2001: Linda Fisher was appointed Deputy Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Her regulatory chores included "enforcing" pesticide regulations, such as Monsanto's herbicide, Roundup, commonly sprayed on GE crops. Fisher was previously Monsanto's Vice-President of Government Affairs. Previously Fisher served as a high-level staffer for another biotech cheerleader, President Bill Clinton.

2002: George Poste was appointed head the bioterrorism division of Homeland Security. Previously, Poste was a Monsanto animal specialist.

The beat goes on today with USDA chief Tom Vilsack, a biotech lapdog.
Learn more: http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm

How deep is the rabbit hole?

Email:
peter_gt<at>geminipress<dot>com

Home

Page Top